4.7 Article

Climate Controls on River Chemistry

Journal

EARTHS FUTURE
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021EF002603

Keywords

changing climate; warming; water quality; river chemistry; concentration-discharge relationships; carbon; nutrients; droughts; flooding

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF-EAR-1724440, EAR-2012123, 1724171, 2012123]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Division Of Earth Sciences [2012123] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [1724171] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the patterns and drivers of river chemistry by analyzing chemistry data from 506 minimally impacted rivers in the United States. The results show a universal pattern of decreasing solute concentrations with increased discharge, indicating that climate plays a dominant role in regulating river chemistry compared to local characteristics. A watershed reactor model is used to understand the relationship between solute concentrations and discharge, revealing the competing processes of solute production and export. These findings have implications for water quality and aquatic ecosystems in a warming climate.
How does climate control river chemistry? Existing literature has examined extensively the response of river chemistry to short-term weather conditions from event to seasonal scales. Patterns and drivers of long-term, baseline river chemistry have remained poorly understood. Here we compile and analyze chemistry data from 506 minimally impacted rivers (412,801 data points) in the contiguous United States (CAMELS-Chem) to identify patterns and drivers of river chemistry. Despite distinct sources and diverse reaction characteristics, a universal pattern emerges for 16 major solutes at the continental scale. Their long-term mean concentrations (C-m) decrease with mean discharge (Q(m)), with elevated concentrations in arid climates and lower concentrations in humid climates, indicating overwhelming regulation by climate compared to local Critical Zone characteristics such as lithology and topography. To understand the C(m)Q(m) pattern, a parsimonious watershed reactor model was solved by bringing together hydrology (storage-discharge relationship) and biogeochemical reaction theories from traditionally separate disciplines. The derivation of long-term, steady state solutions lead to a power law form of C(m)Q(m) relationships. The model illuminates two competing processes that determine mean solute concentrations: solute production by subsurface biogeochemical and chemical weathering reactions, and solute export (or removal) by mean discharge, the water flushing capacity dictated by climate and vegetation. In other words, watersheds function primarily as reactors that produce and accumulate solutes in arid climates, and as transporters that export solutes in humid climates. With space-for-time substitution, these results indicate that in places where river discharge dwindles in a warming climate, solute concentrations will elevate even without human perturbation, threatening water quality and aquatic ecosystems. Water quality deterioration therefore should be considered in the global calculation of future climate risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available