4.6 Article

The Local Exploration of Magnetic Field Effects in Semiconductors

Journal

CRYSTALS
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst12040560

Keywords

semiconductors; dynamic quadrupole interaction; magnetic dipole interaction; gamma-gamma angular correlations

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF [05K16PGA]
  2. German Academic Exchange Service, DAAD
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, CNPq [290102/2011-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the magnetic field effects in semiconductors using the TDPAC technique. The results show that there are almost no intrinsic point defects in the semiconductors, and an electric interaction occurs at low temperatures.
This study reports on the local exploration of magnetic field effects in semiconductors, including silicon (Si), germanium (Ge), gallium arsenide (GaAs), and indium phosphide (InP) using the time differential perturbed angular correlation (TDPAC) technique. TDPAC measurements were carried out under external magnetic fields with strengths of 0.48 T and 2.1 T at room temperature, and 77 K following the implantation of In-111(Cd-111) probes. Defects caused by ion implantation could be easily removed by thermal annealing at an appropriate temperature. The agreement between the measured Larmor frequencies and the theoretical values confirms that almost no intrinsic point defects are present in the semiconductors. At low temperatures, an electric interaction sets in. It stems from the electron capture after-effect. In the case of germanium and silicon, this effect is well visible. It is associated with a double charge state of the defect ion. No such effects arise in GaAs and InP where Cd contributes only a single electronic defect state. The Larmor frequencies correspond to the external magnetic field also at low temperatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available