4.4 Article

Prediagnostic Plasma Adiponectin and Survival among Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Journal

CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages 1138-1145

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0175

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. NIH [P01 CA 087969, R01 CA49449, UM1 CA167552, P01 CA55075, P50 CA127003, R01 CA151993, R35 CA197735, K24 DK 098311, R01 CA137178]
  2. Singhealth Health Manpower Development Plan (HMDP) fellowship award from Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Circulating adiponectin is inversely related to the risk of colorectal cancer. However, its influence on colorectal cancer survival is unclear. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the association between prediagnostic plasma levels of adiponectin and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer. We identified 621 incident colorectal cancer cases who provided blood specimens prior to diagnosis within the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI). After a median follow-up of 9 years, there were 269 (43%) total deaths, of which 181 (67%) were due to colorectal cancer. Compared with participants in the lowest quartile of adiponectin, those in the highest quartile had multivariate HRs of 1.89 (95% CI, 1.21-2.97; P-trend = 0.01) for colorectal cancer-specific mortality and 1.66 (95% CI, 1.15-2.39; P-trend = 0.009) for overall mortality. The apparent increased risk in colorectal cancer-specific mortality was more pronounced in patients with metastatic disease (HR, 3.02: 95% CI, 1.50-6.08). Among patients with colorectal cancer, prediagnostic plasma adiponectin is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer-specific and overall mortality and is more apparent in patients with metastatic disease. Adiponectin may be a marker for cancers which develop through specific pathways that may be associated with worsened prognosis. Further studies are needed to validate these findings. (C) 2015 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available