4.6 Article

Human-Robot Interaction Torque Estimation Methods for a Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robotic System with Uncertainties

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12115529

Keywords

exoskeletons; system identification; force feedback; computer simulation; mathematical model; nonlinear systems

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion de Colombia (Minciencias) [121080864383]
  2. Minciencias
  3. Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (UPB) [727]
  4. Australian Academy of Science (AAS)
  5. UNAM-PAPIIT [IN 102121]
  6. Universidad de Medellin (UdeM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes two human-robot interaction torque estimation methods to cope with uncertainties of Body Segment Inertial Parameters (BSIPs) by using online parameter estimation and estimated parameters. The effectiveness and superiority of these methods are demonstrated through simulations.
Lower limb rehabilitation robot (LLRR) users, to successfully conduct isotonic exercises, require real-time feedback on the torque they exert on the robot to meet the goal of the treatment. Still, direct torque measuring is expensive, and indirect encoder-based estimation strategies, such as inverse dynamics (ID) and Nonlinear Disturbance Observers (NDO), are sensitive to Body Segment Inertial Parameters (BSIPs) uncertainties. We envision a way to minimize such parametric uncertainties. This paper proposes two human-robot interaction torque estimation methods: the Identified ID-based method (IID) and the Identified NDO-based method (INDO). Evaluating in simulation the proposal to apply, in each rehabilitation session, a sequential two-phase method: (1) An initial calibration phase will use an online parameter estimation to reduce sensitivity to BSIPs uncertainties. (2) The torque estimation phase uses the estimated parameters to obtain a better result. We conducted simulations under signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) = 40 dB and 20% BSIPs uncertainties. In addition, we compared the effectiveness with two of the best methods reported in the literature via simulation. Both proposed methods obtained the best Coefficient of Correlation, Mean Absolute Error, and Root Mean Squared Error compared to the benchmarks. Moreover, the IID and INDO fulfilled more than 72.2% and 88.9% of the requirements, respectively. In contrast, both methods reported in the literature only accomplish 27.8% and 33.3% of the requirements when using simulations under noise and BSIPs uncertainties. Therefore, this paper extends two methods reported in the literature and copes with BSIPs uncertainties without using additional sensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available