4.6 Article

Characterization of Microstructure, Weld Heat Input, and Mechanical Properties of Mg-Al-Zn Alloy GTA Weldments

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12094417

Keywords

AZ31 Mg alloy; welding speed; GTA welding; microstructure; mechanical properties

Funding

  1. King Saud University [RSP-2021/256]
  2. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the influence of welding speed on the microstructure, hardness, and tensile properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy gas tungsten arc welds. The results showed that increasing welding speed led to a wider equiaxed zone in the center of the fusion zone, and the highest welding speed resulted in the smallest average grain size. Welds prepared with higher welding speed exhibited increased strength, hardness, and ductility, which can be attributed to low heat input.
The present study investigated the influence of welding speed on the microstructure, hardness, and tensile properties of the AZ31 Mg alloy gas tungsten arc (GTA) welds that were prepared using alternating current (AC). A microstructural examination of the weld metal and base metal was performed using stereo, optical, and scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM and EDS) techniques. The microstructure of all fusion zones consists of two parts: a columnar zone, adjacent to the fusion boundary, and equiaxed grains, in the centre of the weld fusion zone. It is shown that the average width of the equiaxed zone present at the centre of the fusion zone increases with increasing welding speed. Metallographic examination shows that the highest welding speed (5 mm/s) results in the smallest average grain size. The welds prepared with high welding speed exhibit an increase in strength, hardness, and ductility compared with other welding speeds, which is attributed to low heat input.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available