4.8 Article

Engineering the Dipole Orientation and Symmetry Breaking with Mixed-Dimensional Heterostructures

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202200082

Keywords

2D materials; dipole engineering; mixed-dimensional heterostructures; nanowires; optical anisotropy; symmetry breaking

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [314810, 333099, 333982, 336144, 336818, 320167]
  2. European Union [820423, 965124]
  3. EU [H2020-MSCA-RISE-872049]
  4. Business Finland (ALDEL)
  5. ERC [834742]
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [333099, 336144, 333099] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Engineering the dipole orientation and symmetry of materials by integrating 1D nanowires with 2D layered materials is reported. This mixed-dimensional heterostructure enhances optical responses and breaks the symmetry of materials, leading to strong optical anisotropy.
Engineering of the dipole and the symmetry of materials plays an important role in fundamental research and technical applications. Here, a novel morphological manipulation strategy to engineer the dipole orientation and symmetry of 2D layered materials by integrating them with 1D nanowires (NWs) is reported. This 2D InSe -1D AlGaAs NW heterostructure example shows that the in-plane dipole moments in InSe can be engineered in the mixed-dimensional heterostructure to significantly enhance linear and nonlinear optical responses (e.g., photoluminescence, Raman, and second harmonic generation) with an enhancement factor of up to approximate to 12. Further, the 1D NW can break the threefold rotational symmetry of 2D InSe, leading to a strong optical anisotropy of up to approximate to 65%. These results of engineering dipole orientation and symmetry breaking with the mixed-dimensional heterostructures open a new path for photonic and optoelectronic applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available