4.8 Review

Exosome Processing and Characterization Approaches for Research and Technology Development

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103222

Keywords

analytical characterizations; exosomes; exosome clinical trials; extracellular vesicles; Good Manufacturing Practices; isolation processes; MISEV2018 guidelines

Funding

  1. NIH [AG061383, MH118160, HD089679]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exosomes, as extracellular vesicles, have potential as disease biomarkers and therapeutic agents. However, manufacturing high-quality exosomes is challenging due to the lack of standardized practices and reference materials. This review compares exosome processing and characterization methods, recommends exosome workflows, and provides an introduction to exosomes, including their properties and roles in biological processes and disease progression. It also summarizes ongoing clinical trials.
Exosomes are extracellular vesicles that share components of their parent cells and are attractive in biotechnology and biomedical research as potential disease biomarkers as well as therapeutic agents. Crucial to realizing this potential is the ability to manufacture high-quality exosomes; however, unlike biologics such as proteins, exosomes lack standardized Good Manufacturing Practices for their processing and characterization. Furthermore, there is a lack of well-characterized reference exosome materials to aid in selection of methods for exosome isolation, purification, and analysis. This review informs exosome research and technology development by comparing exosome processing and characterization methods and recommending exosome workflows. This review also provides a detailed introduction to exosomes, including their physical and chemical properties, roles in normal biological processes and in disease progression, and summarizes some of the on-going clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available