4.1 Article

Numerical simulation and application of soft computing in estimating vertical drop energy dissipation with horizontal serrated edge

Journal

WATER SUPPLY
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 4676-4689

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2022.127

Keywords

artificial neural network; FLOW-3D; gene expression programming; support vector machine; vertical drop

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used FLOW-3D software to simulate energy dissipation downstream of a serrated-edge structure and evaluated the accuracy of numerical models using ANN, SVM, and GEP methods. The results showed that increasing the dimensions of the edges increased energy dissipation. The ANN method demonstrated higher accuracy in predicting energy dissipation compared to the other two methods.
In the present study, FLOW-3D software was used to simulate energy dissipation by a serrated-edge drop, downstream of this structure. For this purpose, 2, 3, and 4 serrations with two series of relative dimensions at the edge of the vertical drop, with a relative critical depth range of 0.2-0.35 were used for simulation. Then, using Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gene Expression Program (GEP) methods, the accuracy of numerical models was evaluated. Results showed that increasing dimensions of the edges increased energy dissipation, and the highest and lowest energy dissipation was related to the models with 3 and 4 serrations, respectively, Compared to the edgeless state, the 4-edge model, with relative dimension of 0.1, increased energy dissipation by an average of 20%, and the 3-edge model, with relative dimension of 0.15, by an average of 69%. Results of energy dissipation prediction using ANN, SVM and GEP methods showed that although all three models have good accuracy for estimating energy dissipation, the accuracy of ANN method with RMSE of 0.0081 and R-2 of 0.9938 in training phase and RMSE of 0.0125 and R-2 of 0.9805 in testing phase, is higher than the other two methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available