4.4 Article

Evaluation of a two-stage antibacterial hydrogel dressing for healing in an infected diabetic wound

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33543

Keywords

antibacterial; diabetes; drug release; two-stage dressing; nano-Ag

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21175075, 21475070]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2012651, BK2012652, BK2011047]
  3. Application Research Item of Nantong City [BK2013028]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. Dr. Offer Plan of Jiangsu Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various types of wound dressings have been used to treat complex infections in diabetes mellitus. This study is the first to evaluate the healing effects using a two-stage dressing in infected diabetic wounds. A two-stage antibacterial hydrogel dressing (two-stage dressing) was established with two time phases, an antibacterial phase and a drug release phase. We established each phase by using a swelling and rate of drug release test. These results suggested that the antimicrobial phase is activated as soon as the two-stage dressing attaches to the skin. The drugs in the drug release layer of the dressing were released to a greater extent than expected 20-36 h after attachment to the skin, likely due to extensive water absorption. Histological analysis and measurement of vascular endothelial growth factor expression through in vivo testing suggested that the benefits of a two-stage dressing include rapid antibacterial properties, sustained drug release, and promotion of wound healing through cell proliferation as compared with the traditional composite antibacterial hydrogel dressing. Further in vivo tests confirmed that separation of the antibacterial and drug-releasing properties, along with biocompatibility and rapid wound closure rates made two-stage dressings suitable for healing of infected wounds. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 1808-1817, 2017.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available