4.7 Article

Enhancement of Casimir Friction between Graphene-Covered Topological Insulator

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12071148

Keywords

casimir friction; graphene; topological insulator

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12164027, 11704175, 12064025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Casimir friction between graphene-covered undoped bismuth selenide (Bi2Se3) is studied in detail, revealing the contribution of hybrid surface plasmon-phonon polaritons and the impact of chemical potential on optical characteristics. Additionally, the Casimir friction between doped Bi2Se3 is explored, showing a potential increase in friction coefficient due to unusual electron surface states. These findings contribute to the understanding of Casimir frictions and expand the research scope of topological insulators.
Casimir friction is theoretically studied between graphene-covered undoped bismuth selenide (Bi2Se3) in detail. In the graphene/Bi2Se3 composite structure, the coupling of the hyperbolic phonon polaritons supported by Bi2Se3 with the surface plasmons supported by graphene can lead to the hybrid surface plasmon-phonon polaritons (SPPPs). Compared with that between undoped Bi2Se3, Casimir friction can be enhanced by more than one order of magnitude due to the contribution of SPPPs. It is found that the chemical potential that can be used to modulate the optical characteristic of SPPPs plays an important role in Casimir friction. In addition, the Casimir friction between doped Bi2Se3 is also studied. The friction coefficient between doped Bi2Se3 can even be larger than that between graphene-covered undoped Bi2Se3 for suitable chemical potential due to the contribution of unusual electron surface states. The results obtained in this work are not only beneficial to the study of Casimir frictions but also extend the research ranges of topological insulators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available