4.5 Article

Fabrication and in vivo evaluation of an osteoblast-conditioned nano-hydroxyapatite/gelatin composite scaffold for bone tissue regeneration

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 104, Issue 8, Pages 2001-2010

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35731

Keywords

tissue engineering; bone substitutes; bone replacement materials

Funding

  1. Iran University of Medical Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the effects of osteoblast-conditioning on mechanical behavior, biocompatibility, biodegradation and osteoinductive properties of a nano-hydroxyapatite/gelatin (HA/GEL) nanocomposite scaffold was investigated. The scaffold was fabricated using the layer solvent casting combined with the freeze-drying and lamination techniques. The scaffolds were conditioned by culture of osteoblasts on their surface and their elimination by a repeated freeze-thawing process. The potential of the osteoblast-conditioned HA/GEL (HA/GEL/OC) scaffold to support cell adhesion and growth and its cytotoxicity was assessed in vitro using rat mesenchymal stem cells. For in vivo studies, the HA/GEL/OC nanocomposite was implanted in the critical size bone defect created on rat calvarium and studied after 7, 30 and 90 days. The results showed that mechanical and in vitro biological properties of the scaffold were not affected by the process of conditioning. However, in vivo studies demonstrated that osteoblast-conditioning enhanced biocompatibility and osteoinductivity and of the nanocomposite scaffold. The osteoblast conditioning also accelerated collagen content during the bone healing. In the experimental group that received the HA/GEL/OC and MSCs, the newly formed bone occupied almost the entire defect (93.4 +/- 3.3%) within 3 months. In conclusion, this study indicates that osteoblast-conditioning is a viable strategy for the development of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 104A: 2001-2010, 2016.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available