4.3 Article

Systematic review and meta-analysis of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis as environmental trigger of multiple sclerosis

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103671

Keywords

Neuroinfection; Autoantibodies; Neuroimmune; Neuroinflammatory; Neurodegeneration; Myelin damage; Autoimmune disorder

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation, South Africa [135441]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study used meta-analysis to identify a significant association between Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) and multiple sclerosis (MS). This suggests that MAP may be an important environmental factor in the development of MS. Early screening for MAP in MS cases may aid in management and treatment. Future research should focus on the role of MAP in the severity of MS and address global data gaps and low disease surveillance.
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) has been identified as one of the environmental agents that causes multiple sclerosis (MS). The global prevalence of MS has been upsurging over the years; however, efforts to divulge the role of MAP in MS have been limited. As a result, the present study aimed at assessing the odd ratios (ORs) associated MAP with the risk of MS. MAP-related MS data were obtained from 6 databases using the terms 'multiple sclerosis' or 'MS' and 'paratuberculosis' without regard for time or language restrictions following PRISMA standards. A total of 2,538 participants' data from 12 studies presenting anti-MAP antibodies and MAP DNA from 4 studies were fitted in random-effects (RE) and fixed-effects (FE) meta-analytic models. Furthermore, the between-study heterogeneity was measured using I2-values with a significant limit set at an I2 > 75%. Analytical rigor and publication bias was determined using leave-one-out-analytics, Egger's tests, and pcurve analysis. In the FE and RE models, anti-MAP antibodies data significantly associated MS risk with MAP as 10.71 OR (95%-CI [7.78; 14.74], p-value < 0.0001) and 12.76 OR (95%-CI [8.13; 20.02], p-value < 0.0001) respectively, with an I2 value of 34.9% (95%-CI [0.0%; 67.2%]; p-value = 0.11). Similarly, the MAP DNA dataset in FE significantly present MS risk due to MAP as 5.53 OR (95%-CI [3.54; 8.66], p-value< 0.0001) while, RE showed 5.27 OR (95%-CI [3.22; 8.60], p = 0.0017), with an I2-value = 0.0% (95%-CI [0.0%; 84.7%]; p-value = 0.71). Eggers' test, on the other hand, found publication bias in anti-MAP antibodies data (intercept = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.45 - 2.77, t = 2.72, p = 0.021), but not in MAP DNA dataset (intercept = -5.57, 95% CI: -20.44 - 9.29, t = -0.74, p = 0.54). The robustness of the meta-analyses was demonstrated by all sensitivity analyses. In addition, there is no evidence of p-hacking observed (right-skewness test (PFull < 0.001, PHalf <0.001; statistical power >= 94% (95%-CI: 72.5%-99%)). In conclusion, the synthesis revealed a strong association between MAP and MS, indicating that MAP is a significant environmental agent that may trigger MS. Thus, early screening of MAP in MS cases may assist in the therapeutic approach to its management/treatment. Therefore, future studies should be tailored towards the role of MAP in the severity of MS phenotypes, as well as address global data gaps and low disease surveillance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available