4.5 Article

Physical and mechanical properties of cross-linked type I collagen scaffolds derived from bovine, porcine, and ovine tendons

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 104, Issue 11, Pages 2685-2692

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35813

Keywords

collagen; tissue engineering; degradation; mechanical properties; pore size

Funding

  1. Novopedics Inc. (New Brunswick, NJ)
  2. National Institutes of Health under Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (National Institute of General Medical Sciences) [T32 GM8339]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Collagen scaffolds are often utilized in tissue engineering applications where their performance depends on physical and mechanical properties. This study investigated the effects of collagen source (bovine, porcine, and ovine tendon) on properties of collagen sponge scaffolds cross-linked with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)/N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS). Scaffolds were tested for tensile and compressive properties, stability (resistance to enzymatic degradation), pore size, and swelling ratio. No significant differences in tensile modulus were observed, but ovine scaffolds had significantly greater ultimate strain, stress, and toughness relative to bovine and porcine scaffolds. No significant differences in compressive properties, pore size, or swelling ratio were observed as a function of collagen source. Ovine scaffolds were more resistant to collagenase degradation compared to bovine samples, which were more resistant than porcine scaffolds. In comparison to bovine scaffolds, ovine scaffolds performed equivalently or superiorly in all evaluations, and porcine scaffolds were equivalent in all properties except enzymatic stability. These results suggest that collagen sponges derived from bovine, porcine, and ovine tendon have similar physical and mechanical properties, and are all potentially suitable materials for various tissue engineering applications. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available