4.5 Article

Effects of Diatomite Contents on Microstructure, Microhardness, Bioactivity and Biocompatibility of Gradient Bioceramic Coating Prepared by Laser Cladding

Journal

METALS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met12060931

Keywords

broadband-laser cladding; diatomite; gradient bioceramic; bioactivity; biocompatibility

Funding

  1. High-Level Innovative Talents Plan of Guizhou Province [2015-4009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A gradient bioceramic coating doped with diatomite was successfully fabricated on the surface of a metal alloy using broadband-laser cladding process. The addition of diatomite was found to reduce cracks and enhance the bioactivity and biocompatibility of the coating.
Biometallic materials are widely used in medicine because of excellent mechanical properties. However, biometallic materials are limited in the application of biomaterials due to their lack of bioactivity. To solve this problem, a gradient bioceramic coating doped with diatomite (DE) was successfully fabricated on the surface of Ti6Al4V alloy by using the broadband-laser cladding process to improve the bioactivity of metal materials. As well as the DE contents on the microstructure, microhardness, bioactivity and biocompatibility were investigated. The experimental results demonstrate that the addition of moderate amounts of DE is effective in reducing the number of cracks. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) results reveal that the bioceramic coating doped with DE mainly consists of CaTiO3, hydroxyapatite (HA), tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and silicate, and that the amount of HA and TCP in the coating reached maximum when the bioceramic coating was doped with 10wt% DE. The bioceramic coating doped with 10wt% DE has favorable ability to deposit bone-like apatite. These results indicate that the addition of DE can improve cracking sensibility, bioactivity and biocompatibility of the coating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available