4.5 Article

Preheating Behaviors of Iron Ore Pellets with Humic Substance-Based Binder

Journal

METALS
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met12040570

Keywords

preheating behaviors; iron ore pellets; humic substance-based binder; preheating and roasting; oxidation degree

Funding

  1. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2020YFC1909805]
  2. Hunan Provincial Key Research and Development Program [2022NK2057]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2021JJ40776]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It was found that using a humic substance-based binder as a substitution for bentonite in the production of iron ore pellets is effective, but requires a longer preheating time. The emission of humic substance interfered with the oxidation process of the pellets, resulting in a delay in the transformation of magnetite phase into hematite.
Humic substance-based binder (HB) has been found to be an effective substitution for bentonite in the production of iron ore pellets. In this study, it was found that the preheating time needed to be prolonged during the pelletization processing which is a remarkable feature of pellets with HB instead of bentonite. As far as the oxidation behaviors were concerned, a manifest oxidation hysteresis platform was observed in the FeO content vs. preheating time curve during the second minute in the preheating process, which implied that the emission of humic substance noticeably interfered with oxidation process pellets. Consequently, in contrast to bentonite, the magnetite phase could not be completely transformed into hematite until the preheating time reached 16 min. Meanwhile, the SEM-EDS analysis showed that the crystal grains of preheated pellets with HB were well interconnected when the preheating time was 16 min. This also verified that the optimal preheating time of pellets with HB (16 min) was longer than that of pellets with bentonite (10 min).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available