4.7 Article

Nanoarchitectonics of low-dimensional metal-organic frameworks toward photo/electrochemical CO2 reduction reactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101883

Keywords

Low-dimensional nanomaterials; CO2 reduction; Metal-organic frameworks; Photo/electrocatalyst; Nanoarchitectonics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52106257, 51906125]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20210112]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2021QE017]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020GN050]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-dimensional metal-organic frameworks (LD MOFs) with ultrathin structures, fully exposed active sites, and tunable compositions have shown excellent catalytic performance in CO2 catalytic reduction. This review summarizes various synthetic methods for preparing LD MOFs and introduces their unique properties and applications in CO2 catalytic reduction.
Low-dimensional metal-organic frameworks (LD MOFs) have attracted increasing attention in recent years. Their unique properties, including ultrathin structures, fully exposed active sites, and tunable compositions make them excellent catalysts for CO2 catalytic reduction. Even though numerous efforts have been attempted to modify the morphologies of LD MOFs, it is still highly important to explore the synthetic principles and catalytic properties of LD MOFs. In this review, various synthetic methods for preparing LD MOFs are summarized. The unique properties and applications of LD MOFs in CO2 catalytic reduction reaction are introduced and discussed. Finally, several challenges and prospects of this emerging research field are proposed. The present review could provide a comprehensive understanding on the design and synthesis of LD MOFs for CO2 reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available