4.6 Article

Tumor reference resolution and characteristic extraction in radiology reports for liver cancer stage prediction

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 179-191

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.10.005

Keywords

Natural language processing; Information extraction; Reference resolution; Radiology report; Cancer stages; Liver cancer

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [KL2 TR000421]
  2. UW Institute of Translational Health Sciences [UL1TR000423]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Anaphoric references occur ubiquitously in clinical narrative text. However, the problem, still very much an open challenge, is typically less aggressively focused on in clinical text domain applications. Furthermore, existing research on reference resolution is often conducted disjointly from real world motivating tasks. Objective: In this paper, we present our machine-learning system that automatically performs reference resolution and a rule-based system to extract tumor characteristics, with component-based and end-to-end evaluations. Specifically, our goal was to build an algorithm that takes in tumor templates and outputs tumor characteristic, e.g. tumor number and largest tumor sizes, necessary for identifying patient liver cancer stage phenotypes. Results: Our reference resolution system reached a modest performance of 0.66 Fl for the averaged MUC, B-cubed, and CEAF scores for coreference resolution and 0.43 Fl for particularization relations. However, even this modest performance was helpful to increase the automatic tumor characteristics annotation substantially over no reference resolution. Conclusion: Experiments revealed the benefit of reference resolution even for relatively simple tumor characteristics variables such as largest tumor size. However we found that different overall variables had different tolerances to reference resolution upstream errors, highlighting the need to characterize systems by end-to-end evaluations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available