4.6 Review

Benefits and Harms of Treatment and Preventive Interventions for Hereditary Angioedema: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal

GENES
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes13050924

Keywords

complement 1 inhibitor deficiency; effectiveness; genetic disease; harms; hereditary angioedema; systematic review; treatments

Funding

  1. Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC) through the Chiang Mai University [ORA 05/2564]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to identify the best evidence-based treatments for the management of acute attacks and prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE). The study will include both parallel and crossover randomized controlled trials and search multiple electronic databases for relevant trials. The results will be synthesized using pairwise and network meta-analysis methods, considering the effect sizes, evidence certainty, and ranking of treatment effects.
Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disease that can lead to potentially life-threatening airway attacks. Although novel therapies for HAE treatment have become available over the past decades, a comparison of all available treatments has not yet been conducted. As such, we will perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to identify the best evidence-based treatments for the management of acute attacks and prophylaxis of HAE. Methods: This study will include both parallel and crossover randomized controlled trials that have investigated prevention or treatment strategies for HAE attacks. We will search electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CINAHL, from inception with no language restrictions. Potential trials will be supplemented through a gray literature search. The process of study screening, selection, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment, certainty assessment and classification of treatments will be performed independently by a pair of reviewers. Any discrepancy will be addressed through team discussion. A two-step approach of pairwise and network meta-analysis will be performed. The summarized effect estimates of direct and indirect treatment comparisons will be pooled using DerSimonion-Laird random-effects models. The incoherence assumption, in terms of the consistency of direct and indirect effects, will be assessed. An evidence-based synthesis will be performed, based on the magnitudes of effect size, evidence certainty, and ranking of treatment effects, with respect to treatment benefits and harms. Discussion: This systematic review and network meta-analysis will summarize evidence-based conclusions with respect to the ratio of benefits and harms arising from interventions for the treatment of acute attacks and prophylaxis of HAE. Evidence from this network estimate could promote the rational use of interventions among people living with HAE in clinical practice settings. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021251367.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available