4.6 Article

Comparative Genomic Hybridization to Microarrays in Fetuses with High-Risk Prenatal Indications: Polish Experience with 7400 Pregnancies

Journal

GENES
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes13040690

Keywords

microarray; prenatal diagnosis; CMA; aCGH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of the aCGH technique for prenatal diagnosis and assess the frequency of chromosomal aberrations not included in the diagnostic report. The study included 7400 prenatal cases and found a 27.2% chromosomal aberration detection rate, with 71.2% being numerical aberrations and 28.8% being structural aberrations. Clinically significant CNVs were detected in 6.8% of cases, and variants of unknown clinical significance were found in 0.7% of cases. The detection rate of clinically significant submicroscopic CNVs varied among different indications for invasive testing.
The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of the comparative genomic hybridization to microarray (aCGH) technique for prenatal diagnosis, but also to assess the frequency of chromosomal aberrations that may lead to fetal malformations but are not included in the diagnostic report. We present the results of the aCGH in a cohort of 7400 prenatal cases, indicated for invasive testing due to ultrasound abnormalities, high-risk for serum screening, thickened nuchal translucency, family history of genetic abnormalities or congenital abnormalities, and advanced maternal age (AMA). The overall chromosomal aberration detection rate was 27.2% (2010/7400), including 71.2% (1431/2010) of numerical aberrations and 28.8% (579/2010) of structural aberrations. Additionally, the detection rate of clinically significant copy number variants (CNVs) was 6.8% (505/7400) and 0.7% (57/7400) for variants of unknown clinical significance. The detection rate of clinically significant submicroscopic CNVs was 7.9% (334/4204) for fetuses with structural anomalies, 5.4% (18/336) in AMA, 3.1% (22/713) in the group of abnormal serum screening and 6.1% (131/2147) in other indications. Using the aCGH method, it was possible to assess the frequency of pathogenic chromosomal aberrations, of likely pathogenic and of uncertain clinical significance, in the groups of cases with different indications for an invasive test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available