4.6 Review

An Adolescent Boy with Klinefelter Syndrome and 47,XXY/46,XX Mosaicism: Case Report and Review of Literature

Journal

GENES
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes13050744

Keywords

Klinefelter syndrome; mosaicism; 47,XXY/46,XX; review

Funding

  1. Slovenian National Research Agency, Ljubljana, Slovenia [P3-0343, J3-4116, J3-6800, J3-6798]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Klinefelter syndrome is a commonly reported sex chromosome abnormality, which is heavily underdiagnosed due to its substantial clinical variability. This study presents a case of a male phenotype with a rare variant mosaic 47,XXY/46,XX karyotype and summarizes the clinical presentations of reported male patients with 47,XXY/46,XX mosaicism.
Klinefelter syndrome is the most commonly reported sex chromosome abnormality. It is heavily underdiagnosed due to the substantial variability of clinical presentations but is generally characterized by small, firm testes, hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, and the absence of spermatogenesis. Most patients with Klinefelter syndrome have a 47,XXY genotype. If they present with mosaicism, two different cell lines are usually identified, an aneuploid 47,XXY cell line and a normal male 46,XY cell line. There are very few cases of 47,XXY mosaicism with the additional female cell line 46,XX described in the literature. We report a case of an adolescent with the male phenotype and a rare variant mosaic 47,XXY/46,XX karyotype who presented with painless bilateral gynaecomastia. 47,XXY and 46,XX mosaic cell lines were identified with GTG-banding and further characterized using fluorescent in situ hybridization. We summarized the available clinical presentations of reported male patients with 47,XXY/46,XX mosaicism. To improve the clinical management and quality of life in individuals with rare and cryptic genomic imbalances, the genetic diagnosis would need to be extended to atypical cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available