4.5 Article

Multiphysics simulation of the effect of leaflet thickness inhomogeneity and material anisotropy on the stress-strain distribution on the aortic valve

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 49, Issue 12, Pages 2502-2512

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.041

Keywords

Aortic valve; Fluid structure interaction; Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian; Anisotropic material model

Funding

  1. Marie Curie EST Fellowship [MEST/CT/2005/020327]
  2. Leeds Center of Excellence in Medical Engineering - Wellcome Trust
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [WT088908/z/09/z]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Advanced Research Fellowship [EP/D073618/1]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D073618/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/D073618/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a realistic 3D FSI computational model of the aortic valve using the fixed-grid method, which was eventually employed to investigate the effect of the leaflet thickness inhomogeneity and leaflet mechanical nonlinearity and anisotropy on the simulation results. The leaflet anisotropy and thickness inhomogeneity were found to significantly affect the valve stress-strain distribution. However, their effect on valve dynamics and fluid flow through the valve were minor. Comparison of the simulation results against in-vivo and in-vitro data indicated good agreement between the computational models and experimental data. The study highlighted the importance of simulating multi-physics phenomena (such as fluid flow and structural deformation), regional leaflet thickness inhomogeneity and anisotropic nonlinear mechanical properties, to accurately predict the stress-strain distribution on the natural aortic valve. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available