4.7 Article

Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Siponimod in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Analyses of Published Clinical Trials

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.824232

Keywords

model-based meta-analysis; siponimod; multiple sclerosis; population pharmacokinetics; noncompartmental analysis

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project for Significant New Drugs Development, Platform for Postmarketing Evaluation of New Drugs for Rare Diseases [2017ZX09304029-006-001]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project for Significant New Drugs Development, Technology Platform and System Construction of Clinical Evaluation Studies on New Drugs of Pediatric Rare Diseases [2017ZX09304029-006]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project for Significant New Drugs DevelopmentMinistry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [2018ZX09721003-008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pharmacokinetic characteristics of siponimod in healthy volunteers and patients with MS were explored, and it was found that patients with MS have a slightly lower siponimod clearance. Factors such as dosage regimen, body mass index, CYP2C9 genetic polymorphism, and drug interactions may influence siponimod pharmacokinetics.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of siponimod in healthy volunteers and patients with MS based on aggregated data from published clinical trials, and to explore the factors influencing siponimod exposure.Methods: A total of 476 siponimod plasma concentrations aggregated from 28 dosage groups (corresponding to 294 healthy volunteers and 207 patients with MS) were collected from published clinical trials. Population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis was performed using a nonlinear, mixed-effect modeling approach. The pharmacokinetic properties of siponimod in healthy volunteers and patients with MS were compared, and the influence of covariates on siponimod exposure was evaluated using both PPK analysis and noncompartmental analysis (NCA).Results: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described siponimod pharmacokinetics. The typical population parameter estimates of clearance (CL/F), apparent volume of distribution (V/F), and absorption rate constant (ka) were 3.17 L/h, 112.70 L, and 0.38 h(-1), respectively. An 11.85% lower siponimod clearance was estimated for patients with MS relative to healthy volunteers. Subgroup analyses using NCA assessments revealed that siponimod presented an accumulation index of approximately 2 after multiple administration. Compared with nonobese participants, obese participants had a relatively lower dose-corrected area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)/D) (0.31 vs. 0.42 h/L) and V/F (120.95 vs. 133.75 L), and a relatively higher CL/F (3.25 vs. 3.21 L/h). Participants with CYP2C9*2/*3, *1/*3, and *3/*3 genotypes experienced an increased (1.3- and 3.4-fold, respectively) AUC(0-infinity)/D and a decreased (0.7- and 0.3-fold, respectively) CL/F compared with those in participants with the CYP2C9*1/*1, *1*2, and *2*2 genotypes. Fluconazole combination led to a decrease in CL/F (approximately 0.5 times) and an increase in AUC(0-infinity)/D (approximately 1.3 times).Conclusion: Siponimod pharmacokinetic properties in healthy volunteers and patients with MS were explored using complementary model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) and NCA approaches. A slightly lower siponimod clearance was observed in patients with MS than in healthy volunteers. The dosage regimen, body mass index, CYP2C9 genetic polymorphism and fluconazole combination may had influences on siponimod pharmacokinetics. Such model paves the road to more population-based analyses in different patient populations with MS to quantify the effect of any influencing factors on siponimod pharmacokinetics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available