4.6 Review

The Effect and Optimal Parameters of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Poststroke Dysphagia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.845737

Keywords

poststroke dysphagia (PSD); repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); randomized controlled trial; meta-analysis; parameters

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81972159]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (NSFP) [2020A1515010881]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment for poststroke dysphagia (PSD) and explore the optimal stimulation parameters. Method: The databases of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from the establishment to June 2021. All randomized controlled trials about rTMS treatment for PSD were enrolled. Dysphagia Grade (DG) and Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) were applied as the major dysphagia severity rating scales to evaluate the outcomes. Results: A total of 12 clinical randomized controlled studies were included in our study. The summary effect size indicated that rTMS had a positive effect on PSD (SMD = -0.67, p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis for treatment duration and different stroke stages showed significant differences (treatment duration >5 days: SMD = -0.80, p < 0.001; subacute phase after stroke: SMD = -0.60, p < 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed among the other stimulation parameter subgroups (including stimulation frequency, location, and a single stimulation time) ( p > 0.05). Conclusion: rTMS is beneficial to the recovery of PSD patients, while an intervention of more than 5 days and in the subacute phase after stroke might bring new strategies and rational therapeutics to the treatment of PSD. Systematic Review Registration: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022299469.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available