4.6 Article

Effect of Different Carbon Supports on the Activity of PtNi Bimetallic Catalysts toward the Oxygen Reduction

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal12050477

Keywords

polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell; oxygen reduction reaction; carbon nanotubes; carbon nanofibers; electrocatalysts

Funding

  1. National Council for Science and Technology, CONACYT [FSE 245920]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple and controlled chemical synthesis method was developed to produce PtNi nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes and carbon nanofibers. The synthesized catalyst was characterized using various techniques. The experimental results showed that the PtNi/CNT catalyst exhibited higher specific activity and slightly lower mass activity compared to the commercial catalyst in the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) process.
To evaluate supports' effects on catalytic activity toward the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), a simple and controlled chemical synthesis, involving the hot injection of metal precursors, was developed to produce bimetallic PtNi nanoparticles (75 wt.% Pt and 25 wt.% Ni), supported on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbon nanofibers (CNFs). The synthesized electrocatalyst was characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). To determine the catalytic activity, an electrochemical evaluation of the synthesized catalysts in an acidic medium was performed using cyclic voltammetry (CV), CO stripping, and rotating disk electrode (RDE) tests. The presence of Pt and Ni in the nanoparticles was confirmed by EDS and XRD. Based on the STEM micrographs, the average particle size was 30 nm. Compared to the commercial Pt/C catalyst, the PtNi/CNT catalyst exhibited higher specific activity and slightly lower mass activity toward ORR in a 0.1 M HClO4 electrolyte solution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available