4.5 Article

A numerical framework for the mechanical analysis of dual-layer stents in intracranial aneurysm treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 49, Issue 12, Pages 2420-2427

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.026

Keywords

Dual-layer stent; Finite element; Intracranial aneurysm; FRED stent; Bending; Crimping; Design optimization; Spring; Braided stent

Funding

  1. NYU Applied Research Seed Fund
  2. King Abdullah Foreign Scholarship Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dual-layer stents and multi-layer stents represent a new paradigm in endovascular interventions. Multi-layer stents match different stent designs in order to offer auxiliary functions. For example, dual-layer stents used in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, like the FRED (TM) (MicroVention, CA) stent, combine a densely braided inner metallic mesh with a loosely braided outer mesh. The inner layer is designed to divert blood flow, whereas the outer one ensures microvessels branching out of the main artery remain patent. In this work, the implemented finite element (FE) analysis identifies the key aspects of dual-stent mechanics. In particular, dual-layer stents used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms require the ability to conform to very narrow passages in their closed configuration, while at the same time they have to provide support and stability once deployed. This study developed a numerical framework for the analysis of dual-layer stents for endovascular intracranial aneurysm treatment. Our results were validated against analytical methods. For the designs considered, we observed that foreshortening was in average 37.5% +/- 2.5%, and that doubling the number of wires in the outer stent increased bending moment by 23%, while halving the number of wires of the inner stent reduced von Mises stress by 2.3%. This framework can be extended to the design optimization of multi layer stents used in other endovascular treatments. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available