Journal
CANCER MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 20, Pages 3751-3760Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4751
Keywords
esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; overall survival; progression-free survival at 3 years
Categories
Funding
- Natural Science Foundation of China [81874220]
- Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2020A1515010030]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study systematically evaluated 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). The results showed that patients who experienced progression within 3 years had poor survival outcomes, while those who achieved 3-year progression-free survival had excellent outcomes. 3-year progression-free survival can be used as a reliable primary endpoint for study design and risk stratification in locally advanced ESCC.
Background Despite 3-year survival being used as a primary endpoint in some randomized controlled trials (RCTs), limited evidence supports the use of intermediate endpoints to evaluate the effect of new therapies in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). This study aimed to systematically evaluate progression-free survival at 3 years (3-year PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with ESCC. Methods We identified 528 patients newly diagnosed with locally advanced ESCC who received definitive radiotherapy. OS was compared with an age- and sex-matched general Chinese population using the standardized mortality ratio (SMR). Regression analysis was used to validate the correlation between PFS and OS using published data. Results The annual risk of progression decreased to 11.5% after 3 years. Patients who did not achieve 3-year PFS had a median postprogression survival (PPS) of 7.3 months, with a 5-year OS rate of 9.6% and a SMR of 15.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.9-17.5). Conversely, the SMR for patients who achieved 3-year PFS was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.3). We observed a significant correlation between log hazard ratio (HR) (PFS) and log HR (OS) at the trial level (r = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.88-0.90). The strongest correlation was observed between 3-year PFS and 5-year OS in RCTs and retrospective studies. Conclusions Patients exhibiting progression within 3 years experienced poor survival, whereas patients achieving 3-year PFS had excellent outcomes. Our study supports 3-year PFS as a reliable primary endpoint for study design and risk stratification in locally advanced ESCC.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available