4.6 Article

Combining immune checkpoint inhibition plus tyrosine kinase inhibition as first and subsequent treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Journal

CANCER MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 16, Pages 3106-3114

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4679

Keywords

immune checkpoint inhibitor; immunotherapy; renal cell carcinoma; retrospective review; tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Categories

Funding

  1. Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ICI/TKI) is a new standard of care for the initial treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but its efficacy and toxicity beyond the first-line setting are still uncertain.
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ICI/TKI) combinations are a new standard of care for the initial treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Their efficacy and toxicity beyond the first-line setting remain poorly defined. Methods We retrospectively reviewed charts for 85 adults with mRCC of any histology receiving combination of ICI/TKI in any line of treatment at two academic centers as of 05/01/2020. We collected clinical, pathological, and treatment-related variables. Outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity were analyzed via descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Patients received pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, or nivolumab-ipilimumab, with concurrent use of sunitinib, axitinib, pazopanib, lenvatinib, or cabozantinib. Thirty-three patients received first-line ICI/TKI therapy, while 52 received >= second-line ICI/TKI. The efficacy of ICI/TKI therapy decreased with increasing lines of treatment (ORR: 56.7%, 37.5%, 21.4%, and 21%; median PFS [mPFS]: 15.2, 14.2, 10.1, and 6.8 months, for first, second, third, and >= fourth line therapy, respectively). In the >= second-line setting, ICI/TKI was most useful in patients who received ICI only, with an ORR of 50% and a mPFS of 9.1 months. Efficacy was limited in patients who received both TKI and ICI previously, with an ORR of 20% and a mPFS of 5.5 months. Overall, >= second-line ICI/TKI was tolerable with 25 of 52 (52%) patients developing grade >= 3 adverse events. Conclusions ICI/TKI combination therapy is feasible and safe beyond the first-line setting. Prior treatment history appears to impact efficacy but has a lesser effect on safety/tolerability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available