4.5 Article

Boron Phosphide Films by Reactive Sputtering: Searching for a P-Type Transparent Conductor

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202200031

Keywords

bipolar doping; boron phosphide; phosphides; p-type transparent conductors; sputtering

Funding

  1. European Union [840751]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  3. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  4. NSF DMR award [1555340]
  5. Projekt DEAL
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [840751] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work reports on the reactive sputtering and annealing process of boron phosphide films, as well as the extrinsic doping to achieve p-type conductivity. The highest hole concentration to date for p-type boron phosphide has been achieved using carbon doping under boron-rich conditions. Furthermore, the feasibility of bipolar doping in boron phosphide has been confirmed.
With an indirect band gap in the visible and a direct band gap at a much higher energy, boron phosphide (BP) holds promise as an unconventional p-type transparent conductor. This work reports on reactive sputtering of amorphous BP films, their partial crystallization in a P-containing annealing atmosphere, and extrinsic doping by C and Si. The highest hole concentration to date for p-type BP (5 x 10(20) cm(-3)) is achieved using C doping under B-rich conditions. Furthermore, bipolar doping is confirmed to be feasible in BP. An anneal temperature of at least 1000 degrees C is necessary for crystallization and dopant activation. Hole mobilities are low and indirect optical transitions are stronger than that predicted by theory. Low crystalline quality probably plays a role in both cases. High figures of merit for transparent conductors might be achievable in extrinsically doped BP films with improved crystalline quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available