4.3 Article

Robust collaborative optimization for train timetabling and short-turning strategy in urban rail transit systems

Journal

TRANSPORTMETRICA B-TRANSPORT DYNAMICS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 147-173

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21680566.2022.2048120

Keywords

Train scheduling; short-turning strategy; train circulation plan; dynamic passenger demand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the robust collaborative train timetabling optimization problem by integrating short-turning strategy and train circulation plan while considering the uncertainty in passenger demand. The results show that the proposed strategy can better support the balance between stranded passengers and train utilization, and robust strategies perform well in the trade-off between the optimality and conservatism of the solutions.
This paper investigates the robust collaborative train timetabling optimization problem by integrating short-turning strategy and train circulation plan while considering the uncertainty in passenger demand. The passenger dynamics equations are proposed to represent the relationship among headways, short-turning services, and passenger load. A mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) model is constructed to balance train utilization and stranded passengers. The extra variables are introduced to linearize the nonlinear constraints and convert the original model into a robust counterpart model according to the strong duality theory. Finally, two numerical experiments are carried out to verify the validity of the train timetabling model integrating with short-turning strategies. The study shows that the proposed strategy can better support the balance between stranded passengers and train utilization compared to other regular strategies. Moreover, the results indicate that robust strategies perform well in the trade-off between the optimality and the level of conservatism of the solutions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available