4.2 Article

Sleep Propensity under Forced Desynchrony in a Model of Arousal State Dynamics

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 498-508

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0748730416658806

Keywords

circadian; homeostatic; sleep propensity; modeling; circadian phase; wake maintenance zone; forced desynchrony

Funding

  1. Australian Government via Cooperative Research Centre for Alertness, Safety and Productivity
  2. Australian Laureate Fellowship Program (ARC Centre) [FL140100025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An improvement to our current quantitative model of arousal state dynamics is presented that more accurately predicts sleep propensity as measured with sleep dynamics depending on circadian phase and prior wakefulness. A nonlinear relationship between the circadian variables within the dynamic circadian oscillator model is introduced to account for the skewed shape of the circadian rhythm of alertness that peaks just prior to the onset of the biological night (the wake maintenance zone) and has a minimum toward the end of the biological night. The revised circadian drive thus provides a strong inhibitory input to the sleep-active neuronal population in the evening, counteracting the excitatory effects of the increased homeostatic sleep drive as originally proposed in the opponent process model of sleep-wake regulation. The revised model successfully predicts the sleep propensity profile as reflected in the dynamics of the total sleep time, sleep onset latency, wake/sleep ratio, and sleep efficiency during a wide range of experimental protocols. Specifically, all of these sleep measures are predicted for forced desynchrony schedules with day lengths ranging from 1.5 to 42.85 h and scheduled time in bed from 0.5 to 14.27 h. The revised model is expected to facilitate more accurate predictions of sleep under normal conditions as well as during circadian misalignment, for example, during shiftwork and jetlag.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available