4.6 Article

How Do Italian Consumers Value Sustainable Certifications on Fish?-An Explorative Analysis

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14063654

Keywords

fish attributes; sustainable attribute; consumer preferences; best-worst analysis; cluster analysis

Funding

  1. European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) 2014/2020 [0001/ASA/19/PU-CUP B93G19000060007, 508/2014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustainable certifications are important to consumers, especially to medium-aged, high-status, well-educated consumers who live in medium-size households without children. These consumers are more interested in organic foods and are interested in nutritional information, indicating a healthy lifestyle.
Sustainable certifications communicate the environmental benefits of food products to consumers, and allow producers to differentiate their products from conventional ones. This study expands existing knowledge on fish consumers by assessing the importance of sustainable certifications in fish selection. A best-worst analysis was applied to a convenient sample of Italian household members responsible for food shopping, segmented with a latent class clustering model based on their socio-demographic characteristics, fish purchase behaviors, as well as attitudinal features. The results show that sustainable certifications were of interest to consumers, as more than 1 out of 10 respondents valued sustainable certifications in purchasing fish. Respondents interested in sustainable certifications on fish were medium-aged consumers, with high working status, well educated, as well as living in a medium-size household without children. These consumers were more interested in organic foods and had an interest in food nutritional information; they likely have a healthy holistic lifestyle, and may purchase organic food, including fish, to improve their health by increasing their physical well-being.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available