4.6 Article

The Effect of Off-Farm Employment on Agricultural Production Efficiency: Micro Evidence in China

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14063385

Keywords

off-farm employment; agricultural production efficiency; Tobit model; threshold effect

Funding

  1. Joint Research and Development Project Under the Sino-Thai Joint Committee on Science and Technology Cooperation [2017YFE0133000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the impact of off-farm employment on agricultural productivity efficiency in China using data from the China Family Panel Studies. The findings indicate that off-farm employment lowers agricultural productivity efficiency, with self-employed off-farm employment having a greater negative effect. The study also identifies a threshold level of off-farm employment where the negative effect disappears.
With ensuring food security becoming a priority for the Chinese government, the prevalence of off-farm employment (OE) may cast a shadow on agricultural productivity. Based on the data of the China Family Panel Studies in 2018, the Tobit model and threshold effect model have been applied to investigate the impact of off-farm employment on agricultural productivity efficiency (APE), measured by data envelopment analysis (DEA). The result has shown that: (1) OE contributes to a low level of APE. (2) Both self-employed off-farm employment (SOE) and wage-based off-farm employment (WOE) result in lower APE levels when endogenous issues are addressed. However, SOE had a greater negative impact on APE than WOE. (3) There exists a threshold for OE associated with a lower level of APE, indicating that the negative effect of OE on APE disappears when the degree of OE is high enough, SOE has a lower threshold than WOE. The study findings have implications for improving agricultural production efficiency in the context of large-scale off-farm employment of Chinese farmers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available