4.6 Review

Literature Review and Theoretical Framework of the Evolution and Interconnectedness of Corporate Sustainability Constructs

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14084413

Keywords

sustainable development; corporate sustainability; ESG; corporate social responsibility

Funding

  1. research unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policy [UIDB/04058/2020, UIDP/04058/2020]
  2. national funds through FCT-FundacAo para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
  3. FCT-FundacAo para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [UIDB/05422/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concept of sustainable development has been introduced for many years, but there is still ambiguity regarding the definitions and concepts of corporate sustainability and corporate social responsibility. The diversity of research from different fields has led to different interpretations of sustainability in academia and companies. Literature reviews are an important research method for managers to identify sustainability goals for their companies.
The concept of sustainable development (SD) was introduced in the Our Common Future report, launched in 1987, which influenced the emergence of many studies related to the role played by organizations as actors supporting SD. SD is a consolidated concept; however, since 1987, many political, social, and natural events have occurred on our planet, which have impacted companies' behaviors. However, the diversity of research from different fields has provoked, among the academic community, a lack of clarity surrounding sustainability (S), corporate sustainability (CS) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) concepts. This lack of clarity can also be identified in companies, which have referred to sustainability only in the environmental field. Recently, increased discussions related to corporate sustainability metrics have shed light on the ESG criteria (environmental, social, and governance), increasing misperceptions associated with the concept. Ambiguous definitions and constructs may prevent managers from identifying sustainability goals for their companies. Therefore, literature reviews as a research method are more relevant than ever. Thus, in this work, we aim to answer the following question: How should we integrate different perspectives on corporate sustainability, in order to broaden the understanding of the concept? In this study, we conducted a focused bibliographic review and revisited the papers that most influenced the construction of the concepts. The information in this paper is helpful to improve the understanding of CS; to provide specific insights into the studies that have investigated this field; to help managers and entrepreneurs who are improving CS actions in their companies; and to support academia by putting together a large amount of information about this theme in one paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available