4.6 Article

Urban Traffic Noise Mapping Using Building Simplification in the Panyu District of Guangzhou City, China

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14084465

Keywords

noise mapping; traffic noise; acoustic environment quality

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51908142]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A1515012223, 2021A1515012269]
  3. Guangzhou Basic Research Program-City School (College) [202102010384, 202102010410]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study constructed an urban traffic noise map of the Panyu District in Guangzhou City using field measurement and numerical modeling methods. The results showed severe traffic noise pollution along traffic arteries and identified areas that complied with noise limits during different times of the day. The findings contribute to the development of novel construction and analysis methods for large-scale urban traffic noise mapping.
This study constructed an urban traffic noise map (including road and railway traffic noises) of the Panyu District in Guangzhou City by combining field measurement and numerical modeling methods. This noise map was then used to identify the area covered by different noise quality levels and the compliance rate of traffic noise in various acoustic environment functional areas throughout the day, night and day-night. The results showed that traffic noise pollution along the traffic arteries was severe. The area with heavy noise pollution was as large as 157.5 km(2) (29.72%) and 146.2 km(2) (27.59%) in the day and night, respectively. The total area of the Panyu District that complied with the noise limit in the day and night was 326.5 km(2) (61.62%) and 87.2 km(2) (16.46%), respectively. The outcomes of the current efforts can provide new technical guidelines for novel construction and analysis methods for large scale urban traffic noise mapping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available