4.6 Article

Prioritizing Indicators for Sustainability Assessment in Manufacturing Process: An Integrated Approach

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14063264

Keywords

sustainable manufacturing; sustainability indicators; triple bottom line indicator selection; Delphi study; best-worst scaling; multi-criteria decision analysis

Funding

  1. Khalifa University of Science and Technology under RCII-2019-002-Research Center for Digital Supply Chain and Operations Management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to identify and prioritize a consensus structured set of triple bottom line (3BL) indicators for assessing the sustainability of the manufacturing process. The findings indicate that greenhouse/harmful gas emissions are the best indicator in terms of environmental criteria, while the rate of contribution to society and operational cost are the most important indicators for social and economic sustainability.
Sustainable manufacturing has renewed attention among researchers to address various sustainability challenges in manufacturing industries. Sustainability assessments of manufacturing organizations help minimize the negative environmental impact and enhance reputation among public and regulatory agencies. To assess the sustainability of the manufacturing process; it is indispensable to investigate the structured set of triple bottom line (3BL) indicators. Moreover, there is no comprehensive and structured set of 3BL indicators that can effectively assess the sustainability of any organization's manufacturing process. This research aims to identify and prioritize experts' consensus structured set of 3BL indicators. The 3BL indicators were identified through an open-ended questionnaire. The prioritization was performed through the Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) approach. Further, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method was utilized to draw the consensus ranking of sustainability indicators in manufacturing. The findings indicated that the release of greenhouse/harmful gas is the best indicator in the perspective of environmental criteria followed by the rate of contribution to society and operational cost are the most important critical indicator in the case of social and economic sustainability criteria. The outcome of the present study will facilitate researchers and practitioners in developing suitable readiness and operational plans for the sustainability assessment of the manufacturing process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available