4.4 Article

The joy of factorization at large N: five-dimensional indices and AdS black holes

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2022)097

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence; Field Theories in Higher Dimensions; Supersymmetric Gauge Theory; Black Holes in String Theory

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/T000791/1]
  2. WPI Initiative, MEXT, Japan at IPMU
  3. University of Tokyo
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [20K14462]
  5. INFN
  6. MIUR-PRIN [2017CC72MK003]
  7. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [754496 -FELLINI]
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K14462] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we discuss the large N factorization properties of five-dimensional supersymmetric partition functions for CFT with holographic dual. We provide examples to demonstrate the calculation method of partition functions for various observables.
We discuss the large N factorization properties of five-dimensional supersymmetric partition functions for CFT with a holographic dual. We consider partition functions on manifolds of the form M = M-3 x S-epsilon(2), where epsilon is an equivariant parameter for rotation. We show that, when M-3 is a squashed three-sphere, the large N partition functions can be obtained by gluing elementary blocks associated with simple physical quantities. The same is true for various observables of the theories on M-3 = Sigma(g) x S-1, where Sigma(g) is a Riemann surface of genus g, and, with a natural assumption on the form of the saddle point, also for the partition function, corresponding to either the topologically twisted index or a mixed one. This generalizes results in three and four dimensions and correctly reproduces the entropy of known black objects in AdS(6) x S-w(4) and AdS(7) x S-4. We also provide the supersymmetric background and explicitly perform localization for the mixed index on Sigma(g) x S-1 x S-epsilon(2), filling a gap in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available