4.6 Review

Recent advances in water in salt electrolytes for aqueous rechargeable monovalent-ion (Li+, Na+, K+) batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 84-99

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.12.025

Keywords

Aqueous batteries; Concentrated electrolytes; Water-in-salt; Hybrid electrolytes; Solid-electrolyte interface

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M661464]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP180102297]
  3. Future Fellow Project [FT180100705]
  4. ARC Research Hub for Integrated Energy Storage Solutions [IH180100020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the recent advances in water-in-salt electrolytes for aqueous monovalent-ion rechargeable batteries and discusses the corresponding reaction mechanisms, electrochemical performances, as well as the existing challenges and opportunities.
Aqueous rechargeable batteries have attracted enormous attention owning to their intrinsic characteristics of non-flammability, low cost, and the superior ionic conductivity of the aqueous electrolyte. However, the narrow electrochemical stability window (1.23 V), imposed by hydrogen and oxygen evolution, constrains the overall energy density of batteries. The revolutionary water-in-salt electrolytes considerably expand the electrochemical stability window to 3 or even 4 volts, giving rise to a new series of high-voltage aqueous metal-ion chemistries. Herein, the recent advances in water-in-salt electrolytes for aqueous monovalent-ion (Li+, Na+, K+) rechargeable batteries have been systematically reviewed. Meanwhile, the corresponding reaction mechanisms, electrochemical performances and the existing challenges and opportunities are also highlighted.(C) 2021 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available