4.6 Article

Propionate Increases Hepatic Pyruvate Cycling and Anaplerosis and Alters Mitochondrial Metabolism

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 291, Issue 23, Pages 12161-12170

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.720631

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DK-40936, P30 DK-45735, U24 DK-059635, T32 DK-101019, R01 NS-087568, R01 DK-056886, R01 DK-092606, R01 DK-093959, R01 AG-23686, UL1 TR-000142]
  2. Gilead Sciences
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, University of Copenhagen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In mammals, pyruvate kinase (PK) plays a key role in regulating the balance between glycolysis and gluconeogenesis; however, in vivo regulation of PK flux by gluconeogenic hormones and substrates is poorly understood. To this end, we developed a novel NMR-liquid chromatography/tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to directly assess pyruvate cycling relative to mitochondrial pyruvate metabolism (VPyr-Cyc/V-Mito) in vivo using [3-C-13] lactate as a tracer. Using this approach, VPyr-Cyc/V-Mito was only 6% in overnight fasted rats. In contrast, when propionate was infused simultaneously at doses previously used as a tracer, it increased VPyr-Cyc/V-Mito by 20-30-fold, increased hepatic TC Ametabolite concentrations 2-3-fold, and increased endogenous glucose production rates by 20-100%. The physiologic stimuli, glucagon and epinephrine, both increased hepatic glucose production, but only glucagon suppressed VPyr-Cyc/V-Mito. These data show that under fasting conditions, when hepatic gluconeogenesis is stimulated, pyruvate recycling is relatively low in liver compared with V-Mito flux and that liver metabolism, in particular pyruvate cycling, is sensitive to propionate making it an unsuitable tracer to assess hepatic glycolytic, gluconeogenic, and mitochondrial metabolism in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available