4.1 Article

Identification and analysis of human errors in emergency department nurses using SHERPA method

Journal

INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101159

Keywords

Medical error; Nurses; Emergency service; Hospital; Risk assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. Kashan university of medical sciences, Kashan, Iran [98224]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified human errors committed by emergency department nurses at Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan using the SHERPA method. The majority of errors were action errors, which can be reduced through providing appropriate instructions and training nurses, compiling reports and building error recording systems, improving management controls, and promoting a safety culture.
Background: Human errors are the underlying cause of many occupational accidents. In recent years, human errors have increased in the healthcare sector. Aim: This study aimed to identify human errors committed by emergency department (ED) nurses working at Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan using the SHERPA method. Method: This study is a descriptive cross-sectional study performed in the emergency department of Shahid Beheshti Hospital. Human errors were first identified and analyzed using the Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) technique and then studied using the SHERPA method. Results: In total, 426 errors were identified including 263 action errors, 108 checking errors, 35 selection errors, 12 retrieval errors, and eight communication errors. Also, based on the levels presented in the risk matrix in terms of severity of consequences, the highest percentage (36.34%) belonged to the borderline category. Conclusion: The majority of identified errors were action errors, which can be reduced by providing appropriate instructions and training nurses, compiling reports and building error recording systems, improving management controls, and promoting a safety culture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available