4.6 Article

ChaC2, an Enzyme for Slow Turnover of Cytosolic Glutathione

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 292, Issue 2, Pages 638-651

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.727479

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glutathione degradation plays an important role in glutathione and redox homeostasis, and thus it is imperative to understand the enzymes and the mechanisms involved in glutathione degradation in detail. We describe here ChaC2, a member of the ChaC family of gamma-glutamylcyclotransferases, as an enzyme that degrades glutathione in the cytosol of mammalian cells. ChaC2 is distinct from the previously described ChaC1, to which ChaC2 shows similar to 50% sequence identity. Human and mouse ChaC2 proteins purified in vitro show 10 -20-fold lower catalytic efficiency than ChaC1, although they showed comparable K-m values (K-m of 3.7 +/- 0.4 mM and k(cat) of 15.9 +/- 1.0 min(-1) toward glutathione for human ChaC2; K-m of 2.2 +/- 0.4 mM and k(cat) of 225.2 +/- 15 min(-1) toward glutathione for human ChaC1). The ChaC1 and ChaC2 proteins also shared the same specificity for reduced glutathione, with no activity against either gamma-glutamyl amino acids or oxidized glutathione. The ChaC2 proteins were found to be expressed constitutively in cells, unlike the tightly regulated ChaC1. Moreover, lower eukaryotes have a single member of the ChaC family that appears to be orthologous to ChaC2. In addition, we determined the crystal structure of yeast ChaC2 homologue, GCG1, at 1.34 angstrom resolution, which represents the first structure of the ChaC family of proteins. The catalytic site is defined by a fortuitous benzoic acid molecule bound to the crystal structure. The mechanism for binding and catalytic activity of this new enzyme of glutathione degradation, which is involved in continuous but basal turnover of cytosolic glutathione, is proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available