4.4 Article

P-wave and S-wave response of coal rock containing gas-water with different saturation: an experimental perspective

Journal

FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 100-108

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11707-021-0958-x

Keywords

coal rock; gas-water; water saturation; acoustic velocity; relative anisotropy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the acoustic response of gas and/or water saturated coal rock and found that coal type and gas-water saturation affect the acoustic response of coalbed methane formations. The acoustic velocity, relative anisotropy, and their growth rates increase with increasing vitrinite reflectance, density, and water saturation.
The acoustic response of gas and/or water saturated coal rock is fundamental for establishing the correspondence between the physical properties of the coal reservoir and the characteristics of the well-logging response, which is the technology essential for the geophysical exploration of coalbed methane (CBM). This acoustic response depends on water (S-w) and gas (S-g) saturation among other factors. In this study, we performed acoustic tests on dry and different gas-water saturated coal samples with different degrees of metamorphism and deformation, collected from several coal mining areas in China. These tests enabled us to analyze the influence of coal type and gas-water saturation on the acoustic response of CBM formations. Our results show that the acoustic velocity of P-wave and S-wave (V-p and V-s, respectively), and the relative anisotropy of and V-s, increased with increasing vitrinite reflectance, density, V-p and S-w. With S-w increasing from 0 to 100%, the growth rate of the acoustic velocity decreased with increasing vitrinite reflectance. The V-p/V-s ratio of tectonic coal was generally higher than that of primary coal. The growth rate of the relative anisotropy in tectonic coal was markedly higher than that in primary coal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available