4.8 Article

Conservation and divergence of myelin proteome and oligodendrocyte transcriptome profiles between humans and mice

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.77019

Keywords

Oligodendrocyte; myelin sheath; axon-glia interaction; label-free proteomics; scRNA-seq; cross-species comparison; Human; Mouse

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [WE 2720/2-2, 2720/4-1, 2720/5-1]
  2. European Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By using quantitative proteomics, the comparative analysis of myelin proteins in human and mouse models reveals species-dependent diversity, providing important insights for translating findings from mouse models to humans.
Human myelin disorders are commonly studied in mouse models. Since both clades evolutionarily diverged approximately 85 million years ago, it is critical to know to what extent the myelin protein composition has remained similar. Here, we use quantitative proteomics to analyze myelin purified from human white matter and find that the relative abundance of the structural myelin proteins PLP, MBP, CNP, and SEPTIN8 correlates well with that in C57Bl/6N mice. Conversely, multiple other proteins were identified exclusively or predominantly in human or mouse myelin. This is exemplified by peripheral myelin protein 2 (PMP2), which was specific to human central nervous system myelin, while tetraspanin-2 (TSPAN2) and connexin-29 (CX29/GJC3) were confined to mouse myelin. Assessing published scRNA-seq-datasets, human and mouse oligodendrocytes display well-correlating transcriptome profiles but divergent expression of distinct genes, including Pmp2, Tspan2, and Gjc3. A searchable web interface is accessible via . Species-dependent diversity of oligodendroglial mRNA expression and myelin protein composition can be informative when translating from mouse models to humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available