4.8 Article

DNA-PK promotes DNA end resection at DNA double strand breaks in G0 cells

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.74700

Keywords

DNA end resection; DNA-PK; DNA double strand breaks; genome stability; mammalian cells; RPA; Mouse

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH Office of the Director [R35 GM139816, RO1 CA95641]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uncovered extensive DNA end resection at double-strand breaks (DSBs) in G(0) murine and human cells dependent on MRE11 and CtIP. A whole genome CRISPR/Cas9 screen identified the DNA-dependent kinase (DNA-PK) complex as a key factor in promoting DNA end resection in G(0) cells. However, the requirement for DNA-PK in promoting DNA end resection was not observed in proliferating cells at the G(1) or G(2) phase.
DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination is confined to the S and G(2) phases of the cell cycle partly due to 53BP1 antagonizing DNA end resection in G(1) phase and non-cycling quiescent (G(0)) cells where DSBs are predominately repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Unexpectedly, we uncovered extensive MRE11- and CtIP-dependent DNA end resection at DSBs in G(0) murine and human cells. A whole genome CRISPR/Cas9 screen revealed the DNA-dependent kinase (DNA-PK) complex as a key factor in promoting DNA end resection in G(0) cells. In agreement, depletion of FBXL12, which promotes ubiquitylation and removal of the KU70/KU80 subunits of DNA-PK from DSBs, promotes even more extensive resection in G(0) cells. In contrast, a requirement for DNA-PK in promoting DNA end resection in proliferating cells at the G(1) or G(2) phase of the cell cycle was not observed. Our findings establish that DNA-PK uniquely promotes DNA end resection in G(0), but not in G(1) or G(2) phase cells, which has important implications for DNA DSB repair in quiescent cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available