4.8 Article

Testosterone pulses paired with a location induce a place preference to the nest of a monogamous mouse under field conditions

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.65820

Keywords

testosterone; California mouse; vocal communication; social behavior; pair-bond; spatial preference; Other; Peromyscus californicus

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1355163]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tested the rewarding effects of transient testosterone pulses on male spatial distribution in a territory after social encounters. The results showed that males treated with testosterone spent more time at the nest, while female mates of testosterone-treated males spent less time there. It was found that the behavioral effects of transient testosterone changes in the wild can last for days.
Changing social environments such as the birth of young or aggressive encounters present a need to adjust behavior. Previous research examined how long-term changes in steroid hormones mediate these adjustments. We tested the novel concept that the rewarding effects of transient testosterone pulses (T-pulses) in males after social encounters alter their spatial distribution on a territory. In free-living monogamous California mice (Peromyscus californicus), males administered three T-injections at the nest spent more time at the nest than males treated with placebo injections. This mimics T-induced place preferences in the laboratory. Female mates of T-treated males spent less time at the nest but the pair produced more vocalizations and call types than controls. Traditionally, transient T-changes were thought to have transient behavioral effects. Our work demonstrates that in the wild, when T-pulses occur in a salient context such as a territory, the behavioral effects last days after T-levels return to baseline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available