4.5 Article

Wind-Ramp Predictability

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos13030453

Keywords

wind ramp; weather forecasting; wind energy

Funding

  1. National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) [473276]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, extreme wind ramps at different geographical sites in Mexico were characterized, and it was found that mid-latitude systems are the main cause of winter storms while downdraft contributes to summer storms. The study also showed that using statistical techniques can improve wind forecasting by reducing biases and enhancing the prediction accuracy of positive and negative wind ramps.
The intermittent nature of wind resources is challenging for their integration into the electrical system. The identification of weather systems and the accurate forecast of wind ramps can improve wind-energy management. In this study, extreme wind ramps were characterized at four different geographical sites in terms of duration, persistence, and weather system. Mid-latitude systems are the main cause of wind ramps in Mexico during winter. The associated ramps last around 3 h, but intense winds are sustained for up to 40 h. Storms cause extreme wind ramps in summer due to the downdraft contribution to the wind gust. Those events last about 1 to 3 h. Dynamic downscaling is computationally costly, and statistical techniques can improve wind forecasting. Evaluation of the North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM) operational model to simulate wind ramps and two bias-correction methods (simple bias and quantile mapping) was done for two selected sites. The statistical adjustment reduces the excess of no-ramps (<=|0.5| m/s) predicted by NAM compared to observed wind ramps. According to the contingency table-derived indices, the wind-ramp distribution correction with simple bias method or quantile mapping method improves the prediction of positive and negative ramps.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available