4.5 Article

Honeybees as Bioindicators of Heavy Metal Pollution in Urban and Rural Areas in the South of Italy

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos13040624

Keywords

heavy metals; biomonitoring; pollution; bees; Apis mellifera; HCA; PCA

Funding

  1. GAL Molise under the project Bio monitoraggio del territorio con api sentinelle [PSR 2014-2020 Misura 19.2.16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed heavy metal pollution in Molise Region (Italy) by investigating honeybees and compared the health status associated with contamination in different areas. The findings suggest that honeybees can be used as bioindicators for heavy metal pollution.
The honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) has been used in several studies for monitoring the environmental health status in terms of pollution, due to its wide-ranging foraging flights. Based on this consideration, this study aimed to analyze heavy metal pollution in Molise Region (Italy), by investigating five sites characterized by different levels of contamination. Furthermore, the authors carried out a sampling activity for a long period, in order to obtain a complete dataset. In this way, detailed information about the status of the environments was able to be obtained. The main purpose of this work was to assess the health status of Molise Region and to confirm the suitability of honeybees as environmental bioindicators of heavy metal pollution, by analyzing their variability over time and space. Furthermore, the study compared the health status associated with contamination in terms of heavy metals with that in two different areas of Italy, using hierarchical cluster analysis and principal component analysis, to evaluate the correlation existing among the three different areas of Italy. Following the findings, the authors suggest the use of honeybees as a bioindicator for heavy metal pollution in air quality studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available