4.1 Article

25 x 5 Symposium to Reduce Documentation Burden: Report-out and Call for Action

Journal

APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 439-446

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1746169

Keywords

electronic health records; documentation burden; Symposium; nurses; physicians

Funding

  1. AMIA
  2. NLM [1R13LM013581, 5T32NR007969]
  3. National Institute of Nursing Research [5T32NR007969]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The high documentation requirements among United States clinicians have resulted in clinician burnout and suboptimal patient care. The 25 by 5 Symposium aimed to reduce documentation burden by providing a platform for experts to discuss the issue and identify specific actions. The symposium produced a list of interventions for short-, medium-, and long-term goals, with themes including accountability, evidence, education and training, and technology innovation.
Background The widespread adoption of electronic health records and a simultaneous increase in regulatory demands have led to an acceleration of documentation requirements among clinicians. The corresponding burden from documentation requirements is a central contributor to clinician burnout and can lead to an increased risk of suboptimal patient care. Objective To address the problem of documentation burden, the 25 by 5: Symposium to Reduce Documentation Burden on United States Clinicians by 75% by 2025 (Symposium) was organized to provide a forum for experts to discuss the current state of documentation burden and to identify specific actions aimed at dramatically reducing documentation burden for clinicians. Methods The Symposium consisted of six weekly sessions with 33 presentations. The first four sessions included panel presentations discussing the challenges related to documentation burden. The final two sessions consisted of breakout groups aimed at engaging attendees in establishing interventions for reducing clinical documentation burden. Steering Committee members analyzed notes from each breakout group to develop a list of action items. Results The Steering Committee synthesized and prioritized 82 action items into Calls to Action among three stakeholder groups: Providers and Health Systems, Vendors, and Policy and Advocacy Groups. Action items were then categorized into as short-, medium-, or long-term goals. Themes that emerged from the breakout groups' notes include the following: accountability, evidence is critical, education and training, innovation of technology, and other miscellaneous goals (e.g., vendors will improve shared knowledge databases). Conclusion The Symposium successfully generated a list of interventions for short-, medium-, and long-term timeframes as a launching point to address documentation burden in explicit action-oriented ways. Addressing interventions to reduce undue documentation burden placed on clinicians will necessitate collaboration among all stakeholders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available