4.1 Review

Climate Change Impact Chains: A Review of Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities for Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessments

Journal

WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 619-636

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/WCAS-D-21-0014.1

Keywords

Climate change; Adaptation; Communications; decision making; Risk assessment; Vulnerability

Funding

  1. EU
  2. FFG [872000]
  3. BMBF [FKZ 01LS1908]
  4. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs
  5. National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development
  6. Christian Doppler Research Association
  7. Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) Austria
  8. AquaMount project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shifting towards cause-oriented and systemic approaches in sustainable climate change adaptation requires a solid understanding of the causes behind climate risks. Capturing, systemizing, and prioritizing factors contributing to climate risks are essential for cause-oriented climate risk assessments. Impact chains (IC) are used to capture hazard, vulnerability, and exposure factors that lead to specific risks. Challenges and opportunities for improving IC modeling include integrating dynamic feedback and stakeholder involvement. There is still limited understanding of systems, data, and uncertainties in quantifiable and executable models. Using IC to capture the underlying complex processes behind risk supports effective climate change adaptation.
Shifting from effect-oriented toward cause-oriented and systemic approaches in sustainable climate change adaptation requires a solid understanding of the climate-related and societal causes behind climate risks. Thus, capturing, systemizing, and prioritizing factors contributing to climate risks are essential for developing cause-oriented climate risk and vulnerability assessments (CRVA). Impact chains (IC) are conceptual models used to capture hazard, vulnerability, and exposure factors that lead to a specific risk. IC modeling includes a participatory stakeholder phase and an operational quantification phase. Although ICs are widely implemented to systematically capture risk processes, they still show methodological gaps concerning, for example, the integration of dynamic feedback or balanced stakeholder involvement. Such gaps usually only become apparent in practical applications, and there is currently no systematic perspective on common challenges and methodological needs. Therefore, we reviewed 47 articles applying IC and similar CRVA methods that consider the cause-effect dynamics governing risk. We provide an overview of common challenges and opportunities as a roadmap for future improvements. We conclude that IC should move from a linear-like to an impact web-like representation of risk to integrate cause-effect dynamics. Qualitative approaches are based on significant stakeholder involvement to capture expert-, place-, and context-specific knowledge. The integration of IC into quantifiable, executable models is still highly underexplored because of a limited understanding of systems, data, evaluation options, and other uncertainties. Ultimately, using IC to capture the underlying complex processes behind risk supports effective, long-term, and sustainable climate change adaptation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available