4.6 Article

Assessment of Annual Erosion and Sediment Yield Using Empirical Methods and Validating with Field Measurements-A Case Study

Journal

WATER
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14101602

Keywords

erosion intensity; Babolroud watershed; empirical methods; field measurements; sediment rating curve

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the erosion intensity and sedimentation rate of the Babolroud watershed using empirical models and validated their accuracy through field measurements. The results showed that the modified Pacific Southwest Inter-Agency Committee (MPSIAC) and the erosion potential method (EPM) models provided good accuracy compared to field measurements, while the Fournier method was not effective in considering erosion potential.
To implement soil conservation approaches, it is necessary to estimate the amount of annual sediment production from a watershed. The purpose of this study was to determine the erosion intensity and sedimentation rate from a watershed by employing empirical models, including the modified Pacific Southwest Inter-Agency Committee (MPSIAC), the erosion potential method (EPM), and Fournier. Moreover, the accuracy of these empirical models was studied based on field measurements. Field measurements were conducted along two reaches of Babolroud River. Total sediment transport, including suspended load and bed load, was predicted. Bed load transport rate was measured using a Helly-Smith sampler, and suspended load discharge was calculated by a sediment rating curve. The results of this study indicate that the erosion intensity coefficient (Z) of the Babolroud watershed is 0.54, with a deposition rate of 166.469 m(3)/(km(.)(2)year). Due to the existence of unusable crops, the highest amount of erosion appeared in the northern region of the watershed. The results using the EPM and MPSIAC models were compared with field measurements and indicated that both models provided good accuracy, with differences of 22.42% and 20.5% from the field results, respectively. Additionally, it could be concluded that the Fournier method is not an efficient method since it is unable to consider the erosion potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available