4.6 Article

Towards an Extension of the Model Conditional Processor: Predictive Uncertainty Quantification of Monthly Streamflow via Gaussian Mixture Models and Clusters

Journal

WATER
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14081261

Keywords

uncertainty analysis; water resources; cluster analysis; Gaussian mixture model; probabilistic prediction

Funding

  1. department of Huila Scholarship Program [677]
  2. Colciencias
  3. Vice-Presidents Research and Social Work office of the Universidad Surcolombiana
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through research project TETISCHANGE [RTI2018-093717-B-I00]
  5. Government of Cantabria through the Fenix Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research develops a new post-processing method called GMCP, which combines clustering and Gaussian mixture models to manage heteroscedastic errors in monthly streamflow predictions. The results show that GMCP outperforms traditional methods in generating reliable and accurate predictions, especially in dry catchments. GMCP is a promising solution for monthly hydrological prediction and water resources management.
This research develops an extension of the Model Conditional Processor (MCP), which merges clusters with Gaussian mixture models to offer an alternative solution to manage heteroscedastic errors. The new method is called the Gaussian mixture clustering post-processor (GMCP). The results of the proposed post-processor were compared to the traditional MCP and MCP using a truncated Normal distribution (MCPt) by applying multiple deterministic and probabilistic verification indices. This research also assesses the GMCP's capacity to estimate the predictive uncertainty of the monthly streamflow under different climate conditions in the Second Workshop on Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX) catchments distributed in the SE part of the USA. The results indicate that all three post-processors showed promising results. However, the GMCP post-processor has shown significant potential in generating more reliable, sharp, and accurate monthly streamflow predictions than the MCP and MCPt methods, especially in dry catchments. Moreover, the MCP and MCPt provided similar performances for monthly streamflow and better performances in wet catchments than in dry catchments. The GMCP constitutes a promising solution to handle heteroscedastic errors in monthly streamflow, therefore moving towards a more realistic monthly hydrological prediction to support effective decision-making in planning and managing water resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available